Nice! Thanks for the info, Bert.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> The code actually detects if the definition is in the old or new format
> and uses the same format to apply the pegging.
>
> See ‘make_external_description’ which uses ‘
> svn_wc__external_description_format_1’ and ‘
> svn_wc__external_description_format_2’ to handle the different formats.
>
>
>
> (In the pre 1.5 format the ‘-r’ is interpreted as a peg revision)
>
>
>
> Bert
>
>
>
> *From:* C. Michael Pilato [mailto:cmpilato_at_collab.net]
> *Sent:* dinsdag 25 augustus 2015 17:07
> *To:* Subversion Development <dev_at_subversion.apache.org>
> *Subject:* New 'svn cp --pin-externals' feature compat question.
>
>
>
> I was reading up on the new 'svn cp --pin-externals' feature in the 1.9
> release notes. Great addition, by the way, and one that I hope to use
> myself with ViewVC's release tags.
>
>
>
> One question came to mind, though. The use of the feature appears to
> result in pegged externals definitions (as in, @-bearing URLs). That's
> great and obviously the correct approach. But if I recall correctly, this
> means that use of the feature will cause the copy's externals to be written
> in a way that older (pre-1.5) clients do not understand.
>
>
>
> Is that correct? If so, I think that's a fine limitation to have -- no
> complaints at all here. But perhaps this merits a mention in the
> Compatibility section of the release notes?
>
>
>
> -- Mike
>
Received on 2015-08-25 17:47:17 CEST