On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> On 25.08.2015 13:49, brane_at_apache.org wrote:
> > Author: brane
> > Date: Tue Aug 25 11:49:09 2015
> > New Revision: 1697654
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1697654
> > Log:
> > * branches/1.9.x/STATUS:
> > - Approve r1693886.
> > - Temporarily veto r1694481; the change looks broken.
>
> [...]
>
> > @@ -98,5 +84,22 @@ Candidate changes:
> > Veto-blocked changes:
> > =====================
> >
> > + * r1694481
> > + Fix Unix build on systems without GPG agent.
> > + Justification:
> > + This is a user-reported issue.
> > + Votes:
> > + +1: stefan2, philip
> > + -1: brane (You can't just remove a public API implementation,
> > + even if it is deprecated. And the prototyps is still
> > + right there in svn_auth.h)
> > +
> > Approved changes:
> > =================
>
> r1694481 (conditionally) removes the implementation of a public API,
> whilst leaving the prototype in svn_auth.h untouched. This is a
> violation of our ABI compatibility rules, and also a linking error
> waiting to happen.
>
Except that the very problem is that
svn_auth__get_gpg_agent_simple_provider
is not implemented either if SVN_HAVE_GPG_AGENT
is not defined. And that linker problem is the one being
already reported and fixed by the patch.
You are still right that we introduce another linker problem
further down the road for some people that stumbled
across the first one in the past. And not implementing
the public API is a bad thing.
So, I think we need to do some coding to fix this on /trunk.
Question is whether we want to skip r1694481 as a stop-
gap patch for 1.9.1 and enable people to build SVN again.
-- Stefan^2.
Received on 2015-08-25 17:31:35 CEST