On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com> wrote:
> On 28 July 2015 at 00:15, Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan.fuhrmann_at_wandisco.com>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> The 1.8.14 release artefacts are now available for testing/signing.
> >>
> >> Please get the tarballs from
> >>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/
> >>
> >> and add your signatures there.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >
> >
> > Summary:
> >
> > +1 to release
> >
> [...]
>
> >
> > Results:
> >
> > (Not a regression) The text delta code for old-style deltas segfaults
> > when compiled with GCC 4.9 and -O3, e.g. with
> > --disable-debug --enable-optimize. This failes
> > lt-random-test 2: random combine delta test
> > 1.9 does not have that problem and a fix has been
> > proposed for backport.
> >
> Should we consider this problem as a blocker for the release?
>
> I agree that this is not a regression, but is it OK to make a release
> that does not build properly with the *actual* compiler?
>
To clarify: This behavior is new in GCC 4.9.2 and did not occur
with GCC 4.8.2. It may or may not work with 5.1.
-- Stefan^2.
Received on 2015-07-28 17:45:32 CEST