On 28.07.2015 15:48, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 28 July 2015 at 00:15, Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan.fuhrmann_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_apache.org> wrote:
>>> The 1.8.14 release artefacts are now available for testing/signing.
>>> Please get the tarballs from
>>> and add your signatures there.
>> +1 to release
>> (Not a regression) The text delta code for old-style deltas segfaults
>> when compiled with GCC 4.9 and -O3, e.g. with
>> --disable-debug --enable-optimize. This failes
>> lt-random-test 2: random combine delta test
>> 1.9 does not have that problem and a fix has been
>> proposed for backport.
> Should we consider this problem as a blocker for the release?
> I agree that this is not a regression, but is it OK to make a release
> that does not build properly with the *actual* compiler?
Since it's not a regression, I wouldn't treat this as a release blocker.
--enable-optimize is not the default, and the obvious workaround is
simply to not use it. Code built with the default configure options
works, so it's not a question of not building properly.
Received on 2015-07-28 15:57:51 CEST