On 29.06.2015 12:20, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 28.06.2015 22:15, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
>> Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> writes:
>>
>>>> It would be a nice thing to have, but I am thinking that we should first
>>>> nominate this change for a backport to 1.9.x, as we are dealing with an
>>>> API change.
>>>>
>>>> Can we do that without having a complete JavaHL wrapper for this?
>>> Of course. We've never treated incomplete bindings as showstoppers. I'm half
>>> done with the JavaHL change, too; will probably finish tonight.
>> Thanks for confirming my thoughts. I nominated the whole group of changes
>> (r1684940, r1685034, r1687769, r1687776) for a backport to /branches/1.9.x.
> And I have the JavaHL bits done but now I have to leave in 10 minutes,
> which isn't enough time to review and write the log message. Will commit
> this evening.
r1688273; I propose we add it to the existing backport proposal.
-- Brane
Received on 2015-06-29 19:49:36 CEST