SUMMARY:
---------
+1 to release
VERIFIED:
---------
Other than some unimportant link/content differences[1] in
tools/dist/nominate.pl
tools/server-side/svnpubsub/rc.d/svnpubsub
tools/server-side/svnpubsub/rc.d/svnwcsub
and the expected differences in subversion/include/svn_version.h,
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip
is identical to
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/1.9.x@1675149
[1] See http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2013-05/0079.shtml for details.
Note: I calculated the SHA1 checksum of
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip
as c6a7e8187bc1051881010f01647313e9 which *differs* from the published value at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip.sha1
>fciv --sha subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip
//
// File Checksum Integrity Verifier version 2.05.
//
c6a7e8187bc1051881010f01647313e9 subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip
>svn cat https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip.sha1
2443ccc26fd3280b24d38087c5f4291202787f1d
As I mentioned above, I copied the zip contents over the top of a
1.9.x_at_1675149 checkout and didn't notice anything unexpected (though
FWIW the link issue with tools/dist/nominate.pl is new since I last
tested 1.8), so maybe an error on your end Ben?
>gpg2 --verify subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip.asc
gpg: WARNING: multiple signatures detected. Only the first will be checked.
gpg: Signature made 04/21/15 15:55:40 Eastern Daylight Time using RSA
key ID 16A0DE01
gpg: Good signature from "Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org>"
gpg: aka "Ben Reser <breser_at_apache.org>"
gpg: aka "Ben Reser <ben.reser_at_wandisco.com>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 19BB CAEF 7B19 B280 A0E2 175E 62D4 8FAD 16A0 DE01
TESTED:
-------
[Release-Build] x[ fsfs | bdb ] x [ ra_file | ra_svn | ra_serf) ]
RESULTS:
--------
All Tests Pass
PLATFORM:
---------
MS Windows 7 Home Premium Service Pack 1
Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2012 Version 11.0.60315.01 Update 2
DEPENDENCIES:
-------------
APR: 1.4.6
APR-UTIL: 1.4.1
zlib: 1.2.7
OpenSSL: 0.9.8q
Apache: 2.2.22
BDB: 4.8.30
sqlite: 3.7.7.1
Python: 2.7.2 (ActivePython 2.7.2.5)
Perl: 5.14.2
Ruby: ruby 1.8.7
java: 1.7.0_10
junit: 4.8.2
swig: 1.3.40
serf: 1.3.8
SIGNATURE:
----------
user: "Paul T. Burba <pburba_at_collab.net>"
4096-bit RSA key, ID 56F3D7BC, created 2012-12-11
For https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)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=sqLd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org> wrote:
>> On 4/21/15 1:09 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
>>> The 1.9.0-rc1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
>>> Please get the tarballs from
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
>>> and add your signatures there.
>>>
>>> This being a rc1 it means that our soak period for 1.9.0 has begun as described
>>> here:
>>> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/releasing.html#release-stabilization
>>
>> Still need one more Windows vote. Unlike a beta or alpha we need 3 +1's for
>> both Windows and *nix.
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> Running the tests right now, just waiting for the ra_serf variants to
> complete. No failures so far, so I should have sigs incoming by
> tonight barring any unexpected failures.
>
>> If there are objections happy to roll a rc2 with whatever fixes needed. I know
>> we've got several things queued up for a possible rc2.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Paul T. Burba
> CollabNet, Inc. -- www.collab.net -- Enterprise Cloud Development
> Skype: ptburba
--
Paul T. Burba
CollabNet, Inc. -- www.collab.net -- Enterprise Cloud Development
Skype: ptburba
Received on 2015-05-07 22:03:01 CEST