[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: svn commit: r1673919 - /subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS

From: Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:50:26 +0200

Another interesting point comes from Julian’s earlier tests: Adding compressing (mod_deflate?) increases the buffer space on the server side, thereby adding additional time.

(I usually disable this in my test environments for easier diagnostics)

 

                Bert

 

From: Stefan Fuhrmann [mailto:stefan.fuhrmann_at_wandisco.com]
Sent: woensdag 15 april 2015 21:27
To: Evgeny Kotkov
Cc: Subversion Development
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1673919 - /subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS

 

 

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Evgeny Kotkov <evgeny.kotkov_at_visualsvn.com <mailto:evgeny.kotkov_at_visualsvn.com> > wrote:

Evgeny Kotkov <kotkov_at_apache.org <mailto:kotkov_at_apache.org> > writes:

> + -0.5: kotkov (could not reproduce the improvement with a real-world 1.9
> + server; see my e-mail to <dev_at_subversion.apache.org <mailto:dev_at_subversion.apache.org> >)

I regret to say that I failed to reproduce the improvement with a deployed
server and a couple of real-world repositories.

After setting up a D-series Microsoft Azure virtual machine [1] with
Apache 2.2.29, Subversion 1.9.x and simplest httpd.conf content, I tried to
reproduce the lag by just running 'svn log' for both http:// URIs and working
copies. I couldn't tell the difference by eye, so, I cooked up a dirty patch
for the command-line client that measures the time between svn_client_log5()
call and the print call for the first log entry.

Then, I repeated my tests against the patched and the non-patched 1.9.x
servers. The results are attached, and they do not show any noticeable
difference. Does anybody have a strict reproduction script with a 1.9.x
server that shows the practical benefit from this patch?

 

Hi Evgeny,

Thanks for the feedback anyway!
I think you could see a difference for the bsd repo

if you run the log for the /head (which is their trunk)

folder. Via ra_local, I get 2 min (cold) or 9s (2nd run)

for /head but .3s for the root (cold and hot).

Basically, there is special code that makes log for "/"

just enumerate the revisions. And if you don't fetch

revprops or do authz, the send buffers get filled

immediately.

-- Stefan^2.

 
Received on 2015-04-16 10:52:33 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.