Re: Copyright year displayed by command-line tools

On 20.03.2015 14:08, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
> Just a quick check, using the tag creation dates and what is in the file:
>
> 1.1.3
>
> 1.1.4
>
> 1.4.3
>
> 1.4.4
>
> 1.4.5
>
> 1.6.8
>
> 1.6.9
>
> 1.6.10
>
> 1.6.11
>
> 1.6.12
>
> 1.6.13
>
> 1.6.14
>
> 1.6.15
>
> 1.6.16
>
> 1.6.17
>
> 1.6.18
>
> 1.6.19
>
> 1.6.20
>
> 1.6.21
>
> 1.6.22
>
> 1.6.23
>
> 1.8.6
>
> 1.8.7
>
> 1.8.8
>
> (I probably missed a few, as I didn't automate the matching... just
> the fetching)
>
>
>
> Were all released with a nonmatching date. I think 1.7 is the only
> release line where we actually directly updated the year on the
> branch, the year after release. (For 1.6.x we never updated anything)
>
>
>
> +1 on just releasing the releases as-is.
>

And only 1.7 and 1.8 actually matter as far as the ASF is concerned. :)

However, 1.8.[678] are good enough for me to change my mind. Again.

-- Brane
Received on 2015-03-20 14:26:02 CET