On 27.02.2015 18:20, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 17:06:00 +0100:
>> On 24.02.2015 17:01, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> UNLESS there are multiple targets or the operation depth is greater
>>> than 'empty', in which case the output is a pair of (value,
>>> target-path) for each (recursive) target. The target path is either
>>> the (relative or absolute) path of the target or its URL. There is no
>>> provision for whitespace escaping in the value.
>> Here's an example of this format:
>> $ svn info --show-item=last-changed-rev --depth=immediates .
>> 1661934 .
> How about changing "last-changed-rev" to "last-changed-revision"? The
> longer spelling would be self-explanatory and consistent with everything
> else (we don't use the term "rev" anywhere else user-facing).
Yes we do:
$ svn info | grep Rev:
Last Changed Rev: 1662668
> intended users are scripts so a longer spelling is not a problem there,
I don't oppose the change. We can have both spellings, too.
Received on 2015-02-27 21:04:21 CET