[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1661797 - /subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS

From: Branko ─îibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:26:21 +0100

On 23.02.2015 22:56, rhuijben_at_apache.org wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Mon Feb 23 21:56:06 2015
> New Revision: 1661797
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1661797
> Log:
> Nominate a few things, that I think should be released in 1.9, but can
> only be easily backported as a huge catch-up merge.

Bert, if you think we need a big catch-up merge before rolling the 1.9
beta, I suggest you say so here, on dev@. IRC and commit logs have a
tendency to get lost in the cracks.

FWIW, I don't see any reason not do do such a merge.

> But I'm not sure if we should release a 1.9.0 with so many known issues,
> on how you can corrupt wc.db.

Surely it's better to release with known issues than with unknown
issues, yet we've been doing the latter for years. :)

-- Brane
Received on 2015-02-24 12:27:42 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.