[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Simplify implementation of lock / unlock operations in FSFS

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:43:59 +0000

Sergey Raevskiy <sergey.raevskiy_at_visualsvn.com> writes:

> Yes, the behaviour is *not* exactly the same -- the index files is updated in
> different order. Furthermore, I've realized that current version of algorithm
> will set some locks even if update of some index files is failed.

I think that is OK. What matters is that the lock database remains
valid when writes fail: i.e. lock files never exist without all the
index entries.

Committed in r1659212. Thanks! 

-- 
Philip Martin | Subversion Committer
WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*
Received on 2015-02-12 11:46:44 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.