On 6 February 2015 at 16:50, Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> On 06.02.2015 14:47, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On 6 February 2015 at 16:13, Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:ivan_at_visualsvn.com]
>>>> Sent: vrijdag 6 februari 2015 14:04
>>>> To: Bert Huijben
>>>> Cc: Subversion Development
>>>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1657782 - /subversion/branches/reuse-ra-
>>>> session/BRANCH-README
>>>>
>>>> On 6 February 2015 at 15:55, Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: brane_at_apache.org [mailto:brane_at_apache.org]
>>>>>> Sent: vrijdag 6 februari 2015 12:10
>>>>>> To: commits_at_subversion.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: svn commit: r1657782 - /subversion/branches/reuse-ra-
>>>>>> session/BRANCH-README
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Author: brane
>>>>>> Date: Fri Feb 6 11:09:54 2015
>>>>>> New Revision: 1657782
>>>>>>
>>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1657782
>>>>>> Log:
>>>>>> On the reuse-ra-session branch: Documentation change: Instead of
>>>> expecting
>>>>>> clients to manage the lifetime of idle sessions, expect that the RA cache
>>>>>> implementation will take care of that itself and hide the complexity
>>>>>> from the API.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * BRANCH-README:
>>>>>> Remove todo item about svn_client_close_all_sessions.
>>>>>> Add todo item about idle session expiry.
>>>>> How do we expire idle sessions if a client only uses Subversion api's once a
>>>> day?
>>>>> I don't think we want to rely on timers or threads.
>>>>>
>>>> One solution is to record last time RA session used and check it when
>>>> we're going to reuse this particular RA session.
>>> That doesn't reduce the usage of limited resources to until we try to use them later.
>>>
>> The limit on number of idle open RA sessions is already in TODO list:
>> - Limit the number of idle open sessions in the cache.
>
> No it's not. :)
>
Email is slower than Subversion developers :)
--
Ivan Zhakov
Received on 2015-02-06 14:54:21 CET