On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com> wrote:
> On 2 January 2015 at 15:43, <stefan2_at_apache.org> wrote:
> > Author: stefan2
> > Date: Fri Jan 2 12:43:42 2015
> > New Revision: 1649012
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1649012
> > Log:
> > Merge branches/fsx-id in /trunk, remove the BRANCH-README and
> > resolve trivial conflicts.
> Do I understand correctly that you have merged branch without
> resolving concerns about dirent_t structure naming raised dev@ list
> two weeks ago  ?
>  http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2014-12/0130.shtml
You do. Since there was more than just the dirent_t
structure that should have been renamed, the changes
were beyond the scope of the branch. Moreover, fewer
merge conflicts could be expected by first merging
outstanding changes into FSX and then modifying
hundreds of LOC.
So, I merged first and went through all non-ID-related
changes later the same day. All nice and consistent
now with moderate work. Makes sense?
Received on 2015-01-05 13:44:17 CET