[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [RFC] Refining our naming rules

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 20:12:38 +0100

On 02.01.2015 23:04, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 02.01.2015 13:31, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>> Now there are only two points left
>> * Be explicit in our coding style guide about the mandatory
>> svn_ prefix in all non-static identifiers.
> If this is not already stated explicitly in HACKING, it should be. You
> just volunteered to check and fix. :)
>> * Don't shorten library names. No need to fix that for older
>> FS but get it right in FSX.
> Ack.

On second thoughts, consider what we're doing on the authzperf branch:

  * "local" symbols that are not exported (struct and enum names and
    typedefs) are simply called authz_something_t;
  * "local" function names are svn_authz__something, even though there's
    no "libsvn_authz" or svn_authz.h. The symbol name should indicate
    grouping by logical module rather than by library name; we do this
    all over the place in libsvn_subr, and it should be just fine in
    other libraries (IMO, as long as module implementations aren't split
    amongst several libraries).

-- Brane
Received on 2015-01-04 20:13:17 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.