[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Time to branch 1.9

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 17:30:40 +0100

On 07.11.2014 16:02, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Nov 7, 2014, at 6:46 AM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 07.11.2014 14:07, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>> Actually, I have used my veto on the log addressing feature two months
>>> ago [1].
>> How many times do how many people have to explain that saying "-1"
>> without substantiating that with technical reasons is not a valid veto?
>>
>> -- Brane
> I think it is fair to ask whether it makes sense to introduce a fairly risky feature that adds marginal benefits into a mature and stable area of the code.

Performance test results seem to imply that the benefits are far from
marginal.

-- Brane
Received on 2014-11-07 17:31:59 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.