[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Time to branch 1.9

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 07:02:49 -0800

> On Nov 7, 2014, at 6:46 AM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>
>> On 07.11.2014 14:07, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> Actually, I have used my veto on the log addressing feature two months
>> ago [1].
>
> How many times do how many people have to explain that saying "-1"
> without substantiating that with technical reasons is not a valid veto?
>
> -- Brane

I think it is fair to ask whether it makes sense to introduce a fairly risky feature that adds marginal benefits into a mature and stable area of the code.

I question why we are even still introducing these new fsfs formats when the benefits are relatively small.

Build FSX, make it awesome then make it the default someday.

I am not going to block 1.9 over this but I wish we'd stop doing these sort of "improvements". In the past, I also thought we were against adding features that exposed a bunch of obscure configuration options as well.

Stepping on a plane in a few ...

Mark
Received on 2014-11-07 16:03:24 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.