Re: Time to branch 1.9
From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 07:02:49 -0800
> On Nov 7, 2014, at 6:46 AM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
I think it is fair to ask whether it makes sense to introduce a fairly risky feature that adds marginal benefits into a mature and stable area of the code.
I question why we are even still introducing these new fsfs formats when the benefits are relatively small.
Build FSX, make it awesome then make it the default someday.
I am not going to block 1.9 over this but I wish we'd stop doing these sort of "improvements". In the past, I also thought we were against adding features that exposed a bunch of obscure configuration options as well.
Stepping on a plane in a few ...
Mark
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.