[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Time to branch 1.9

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 06:32:25 +0100

On 04.11.2014 17:58, Branko Čibej wrote:
> You still have, and always will have, the option to raise a veto. With
> arguments. About specific problems in the code. I've asked you to do
> that uncountable times. So now please don't try to hide behind
> community decisions and raise that veto already, so that we can
> discuss it and bring this sad state of affairs to an end.

Just to be clear: A vote would not in any way change your, or anyone
else's, opinion of the log-addressing feature; we'd get some +1 votes
and some -1 votes, and maybe the vote would pass or maybe not. But it
would not solve any real problems.

Compare this to our backport voting, where -1 /is/ a veto, with all the
consequences and requirements to make it valid.

That is why I said that a vote makes no sense for code that's already on
trunk; but a veto does.

-- Brane
Received on 2014-11-05 06:34:28 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.