Re: Don't reject arguments of the form ".@PEG"

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 01:04:21PM +0000, Julian Foad wrote:
> I (Julian Foad) wrote:
> > An 'svn' command-line argument of the form "._at_PEG" raises the error
> >
> >   svn: E125001: '@PEG' is just a peg revision. Maybe try '@PEG@' instead?
> [...]
> > I intend to correct this, to make arguments of the form "._at_PEG"
> > syntactically acceptable.
>
> Committed r1635118.
>
> - Julian

Don't you think we should bump the API for this?

Whenever I made similar changes in the past (changing just the
semantics of function arguments) others usually called for a bump.
Received on 2014-10-29 14:11:32 CET