On 27 August 2014 19:41, Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan.fuhrmann_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 26 August 2014 21:18, Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>> > On 26.08.2014 18:46, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> >
>> > On 18 August 2014 19:50, <stefan2_at_apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Author: stefan2
>> > Date: Mon Aug 18 15:50:44 2014
>> > New Revision: 1618641
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1618641
>> > Log:
>> > Within FSFS, replace the use of svn__strtol with a variant that
>> > provides overflow detection. FSFS needs a locale-independent
>> > and preferrably quick number parser.
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > Stefan,
>> >
>> > It maybe worth to make tests for this function (making it private to
>> > libsvn_subr for this). What do you think?
>> >
>> >
>> > Currently, this function is only used in a couple places within FSFS.
>> > FWIW
>> > this does not prevent writing tests for it; we do already have C tests
>> > for
>> > libsvn_fs_fs.
>> >
>> > I did raise the same question in Sheffield, but was convinced that
>> > moving
>> > that code around for formality's sake serves no useful purpose.
>> >
>> I'm fine to keep libsvn_fs_fs if we could write test for this
>> function, but I think that test will be very useful for this function.
>
>
> Test added in r1620913.
>
Is it true that you uncovered the bug in svn_fs_fs__id_parse() fixed
in r1620912 using this new test?
--
Ivan Zhakov
Received on 2014-08-27 18:58:50 CEST