Re: Revprop caching plan
From: Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan.fuhrmann_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 13:31:08 +0200
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:50:40PM +0200, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
Just like any other r/o access, svnlook will not be affected. 'svnadmin
> If so, did we ever impose a requirement like this?
I don't know. But we did have feature compatibility requirements
And what will happen if people try this? Will they get an error?
People will get an error if one of the currently released 1.8 server
Local modifications via non-caching pre-1.9 applications may
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.