[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion 1.9.0-dev FSFS performance tests

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 17:23:14 +0200

On 07.07.2014 17:07, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 07/07/2014 10:58 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> My technical opinion that FSFS7/log addressing is slower by design,
>> because it's doing more (read index, then read data instead of just
>> read data) and only caching makes them comparable on performance to
>> FSFS6 repositories.
> I'm coming into this kinda late and after two weeks of vacation, so
> please forgive me if I misunderstand the above, but is it true that
> FSFS7 requires some kind of non-trivial caching just to match FSFS6's
> performance?

Yup. 

-- 
Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion
WANdisco // Non-Stop Data
e. brane_at_wandisco.com
Received on 2014-07-07 17:31:43 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.