On 20 June 2014 12:33, Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan.fuhrmann_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've performed several FSFS performace tests using latest Subversion
>> from trunk_at_r1602928.
>>
>> Please find results bellow. I'm also attaching results as a table in
>> pdf for easier reading.
>>
>> Environment:
>> Windows Server 2012 R2 (x64)
>> 2 GB RAM, with 2 virtual processors hosted on Macbook with SSD disk
>> Subversion 1.9.0-dev from trunk_at_r1602928
>> Test data: Ruby project repository (46054 revisions, 400mb-500mb size on
>> disk)
>>
>> All tests are performed using default options.
>>
>> Tests performed:
>> 1. svnadmin load -- loading first 5000 revisions into repository
>> 2. svnadmin dump -- dumping all repository revions to NUL
>> 3. svn log http:// -- svn log over http:// protocol to NUL
>> 4. svn log file:// -- svn log over file:// protocol to NUL
>> 5. svn export http:// -- svn export over http:// protocol to local disk
>> 6. svn export file:// -- svn export over file:// protocol to local disk
>>
>> Subversion 1.9.0-dev, fsfs6 unpacked repository
>> ===============================================
>
> ..
>>
>> svn export http:// 7.336 7.757 7.437
>> svn export file:// 4.151 4.854 4.310
>
>
> Did you actually run the export on the repository root?
I did run svn export only for trunk of course, but I tested svn log on
repository root.
--
Ivan Zhakov
Received on 2014-06-20 12:38:14 CEST