Re: Subversion 1.9.0-dev FSFS performance tests

On 19.06.2014 17:06, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> Turn out that the ruby repo is something special
> in that it has very deep histories of relatively few,
> very small files combined with one huge changelog
> file (the latter taking up ~75% of the repo). See
> below for details.
>
> Also, please note that your exports contained
> >500000 files. Using 16MB of cache with that
> project size *may* not be an adequate setup.
> Upping that to insane 256MB (roughly what 1.6
> would use anyway), gives much better numbers.
> However, there is hardly a difference between
> f6 and f7 in these runs.

Heh, this sound suspiciously like saying that one has to have the right
test data to make v7 faster than v6. :)

-- 
Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion
WANdisco // Non-Stop Data
e. brane_at_wandisco.com