RE: svn commit: r1586947 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs: dag.c dag.h tree.c

But are you using 100% the same binaries on the server side and in the client?

(As far as I know most binary providers deliver different binaries towards servers and clients)

I don’t think we usually compile the client code with memcached support, and a few other server side technologies.

If you really want the best support, turning off gettext on the server side (where you usually don’t run your svn and certainly don’t share binaries between them), might make a huge difference.

                Bert

From: Branko Čibej [mailto:brane_at_wandisco.com]
Sent: maandag 14 april 2014 16:51
To: Subversion Development
Subject: RE: svn commit: r1586947 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs: dag.c dag.h tree.c

On 14 Apr 2014 14:55, "Bert Huijben" <bert_at_qqmail.nl <mailto:bert_at_qqmail.nl> > wrote:
>
> But why do we use gettext on server processes side in the first place?

FSFS is far from being exclusively server-side. And there are better ways for avoiding gettext than trying to guess whether your code is running in a server process or not. Who's proposing micro-optimisations now?

-- Brane
Received on 2014-04-14 17:15:22 CEST