RE: svn commit: r1586947 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs: dag.c dag.h tree.c

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:50:41 +0200

On 14 Apr 2014 14:55, "Bert Huijben" <bert_at_qqmail.nl> wrote:
>
> But why do we use gettext on server processes side in the first place?

FSFS is far from being exclusively server-side. And there are better ways
for avoiding gettext than trying to guess whether your code is running in a
server process or not. Who's proposing micro-optimisations now?

-- Brane
Received on 2014-04-14 16:51:16 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bert Huijben: "RE: svn commit: r1586947 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs: dag.c dag.h tree.c"
Previous message: Stefan Fuhrmann: "Fulltext caching and server (non-)scalability"
In reply to: Bert Huijben: "RE: svn commit: r1586947 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs: dag.c dag.h tree.c"
Next in thread: Bert Huijben: "RE: svn commit: r1586947 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs: dag.c dag.h tree.c"
Reply: Bert Huijben: "RE: svn commit: r1586947 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs: dag.c dag.h tree.c"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]