[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1535399 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_fs_fs/ libsvn_fs_x/ libsvn_subr/ libsvn_wc/ mod_authz_svn/ tests/cmdline/ tests/libsvn_client/ tests/libsvn_fs_fs/ tests/libsvn_fs_x/ tests/libsvn_subr/ tests/libsvn_wc/

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:50:26 +0200

On 25.10.2013 11:40, Philip Martin wrote:
> Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> writes:
>
>> Sideline: *IF* we, as a community, agree to do this, then: (a) the rule
>> should be documented in HACKING, and (b) there should be a '#define
>> NULLPTR ((void*)0)' or reasonable facsimile in either svn_types.h or
>> svn_private_config.h. I really do not want to see '(char*)NULL' all over
>> the place. That's ... unsightly.
> That would be incompatible with C++ since (void*) doesn't automatically
> convert to (char*) by default.

You do realize that this is entirely irrelevant for varargs, don't you?

> I'd like to avoid such incompatibilities
> because I'd like to be able to use a C++ compiler at some point to catch
> things like enum mismatches. I suppose we could have NULLCHARPTR for
> variadic functions expecting (char*) which is the common case.

For all I care it can be ((intptr_t)0) which will always be the correct
size and can always be converted to a null pointer constant. But I'm
also pretty sure that we definitely do not want to use this special
constant in anything but varargs. Maybe call it VA_NULL, to make the
intent more mnemonic.

-- Brane

-- 
Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion
WANdisco // Non-Stop Data
e. brane_at_wandisco.com
Received on 2013-10-25 11:51:03 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.