[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: fsfs-format7 integration plan

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 10:06:37 -0400

On 07/01/2013 09:42 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 09:08:17AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> {{{
>> Should we require vote-based approval on the reintegration of feature
>> branches? At least some of the hackathon attendees favor the typical “three
>> +1's and no vetos” – the room was not polled for general consensus here,
>> though. Proponents claim that this both helps to solve the inherent dangers
>> of code bombs (it minimizes *cognitive* destabilization) and also encourages
>> feature composers to do a better job of vetting their designs in advance so
>> as to a) ignite interest and attention and b) reduce the chance of
>> widespread disapproval of the feature or the approach taken.
>> }}}
>>
>> But I don't recall any follow-up discussion or anything approaching
>> consensus having happened in an official channel.
>
> I like the idea. Should we start a separate thread to discuss this?
>

+1

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Enterprise Cloud Development

Received on 2013-07-01 16:07:20 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.