[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: fsfs-format7 integration plan

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 15:42:24 +0200

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 09:08:17AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> {{{
> Should we require vote-based approval on the reintegration of feature
> branches? At least some of the hackathon attendees favor the typical “three
> +1's and no vetos” – the room was not polled for general consensus here,
> though. Proponents claim that this both helps to solve the inherent dangers
> of code bombs (it minimizes *cognitive* destabilization) and also encourages
> feature composers to do a better job of vetting their designs in advance so
> as to a) ignite interest and attention and b) reduce the chance of
> widespread disapproval of the feature or the approach taken.
> }}}
>
> But I don't recall any follow-up discussion or anything approaching
> consensus having happened in an official channel.
 
I like the idea. Should we start a separate thread to discuss this?
Received on 2013-07-01 15:43:19 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.