[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [serf-dev] [Patch] Adding NTLM Support to Serf - Work in progress / Subversion regression

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 16:32:36 +0200

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 04:24:14PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 20.06.2013 16:00, Mark Phippard wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com> wrote:
> > I fail to see how you can justify a veto here.
>
> I have to agree. The veto is fine on aesthetic grounds but kind of fails
> to take account of reality.

+1. I'm under the same impression. I don't really understand the
protocols involved, and don't know anything about various
implementations which might be buggy or what not... but I see a
serious problem if an authentication scheme that used to work just
fine with 1.7 clients suddently stops working with 1.8 for no reason
other than "serf only supports a newer protocol".
Received on 2013-06-20 16:33:09 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.