Re: Kidney blame's behaviour and edge cases
From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:54:47 +0200
On 13.06.2013 10:35, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
It strikes me that what you're really looking for is either
-rN:M -> [N, M-1],
which would make the two blame variants symmetrical, or
-rN:M -> [N+1,M]
as you don't really have to find "the next interesting change" -- you
-cN:M -> [N+1,M]
and I'm not sure we currently do it that way.
-- Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion WANdisco // Non-Stop Data e. brane_at_wandisco.comReceived on 2013-06-13 10:55:23 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.