On 17.05.2013 15:58, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>> On 17.05.2013 15:32, ivan_at_apache.org wrote:
>>> --- subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS (original)
>>> +++ subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS Fri May 17 13:32:56 2013
>>> @@ -124,6 +124,14 @@ Candidate changes:
>>> +1: stefan2 (for 1.8.1)
>>> +* r1483781
>>> + Fix FSFS repository corruption on power or network disk failure on Windows:
>>> + http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2013-05/0245.shtml
>>> + Justification:
>>> + Repository corruption. Regression from 1.6.x
>>> + Votes:
>>> + +1: ivan
>> Is this considered a blocker? Should we roll RC3 next week and restart
>> the soak period?
> I consider this a blocker. I'm also proposed to backport to 1.7.x and
> I think we cannot release 1.8.0 with regression against latest 1.7.x.
> But problem that we have other places with the same problem in FSFS
> code. In setrevprop code for example. I'm going to find them and fix.
Understood. Thanks for finding this -- and BTW I agree with your
analysis, it reminded me that I saw similar behaviour (file renamed
after power cycle, but contents gone) years ago on a completely
In other words, +1 for fixing this in 1.8.0.
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
Received on 2013-05-17 16:08:42 CEST