[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1483795 - /subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS

From: Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 17:58:38 +0400

On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> On 17.05.2013 15:32, ivan_at_apache.org wrote:
>> --- subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS (original)
>> +++ subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS Fri May 17 13:32:56 2013
>> @@ -124,6 +124,14 @@ Candidate changes:
>> Votes:
>> +1: stefan2 (for 1.8.1)
>>
>> +* r1483781
>> + Fix FSFS repository corruption on power or network disk failure on Windows:
>> + http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2013-05/0245.shtml
>> + Justification:
>> + Repository corruption. Regression from 1.6.x
>> + Votes:
>> + +1: ivan
>> +
>
> Is this considered a blocker? Should we roll RC3 next week and restart
> the soak period?
>
I consider this a blocker. I'm also proposed to backport to 1.7.x and
I think we cannot release 1.8.0 with regression against latest 1.7.x.

But problem that we have other places with the same problem in FSFS
code. In setrevprop code for example. I'm going to find them and fix.

-- 
Ivan Zhakov
CTO | VisualSVN | http://www.visualsvn.com
Received on 2013-05-17 15:59:31 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.