On 04/10/2013 12:33 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:34:12AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> On 04/10/2013 11:23 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>>> So shall we get this branch branched very soon? For the sake of making a
>>> decision, I'll suggest that we should try hard to get the things above
>>> resolved by the end of tomorrow, and that even if we don't they are not
>>> blockers, so:
>>> Let's branch on Friday.
>>> Any support or objections?
>> None. In fact, thanks to your email, I had to discard my own draft mail
>> which said similar things but suggested we branch on Monday. :-)
>> (Paul, Bert: If you're watching for that mail from me, it won't get sent
>> now -- we can discuss and +1 on this thread just as easily.)
>> +1 to a Friday branch unless folks raise reasonable objections.
> Right now, trunk has APIs backing an 'svnadmin info' (or 'svnlook info')
> command but not a UI for them. (Some of them have unit tests.) I think we
> don't want to release with just the half-backed APIs, so we'll have to either
> revert them or add a UI for them. As far as I'm concerned reverting is fine,
> and I can continue the work on trunk and propose for backport before, say,
Either revert or privatize them -- whatever's easiest. Now's really not the
best time to be trying to introduce new UI, methinks.
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
Received on 2013-04-10 19:45:18 CEST