On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:34:12AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 04/10/2013 11:23 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> > So shall we get this branch branched very soon? For the sake of making a
> > decision, I'll suggest that we should try hard to get the things above
> > resolved by the end of tomorrow, and that even if we don't they are not
> > blockers, so:
> >
> > Let's branch on Friday.
> >
> > Any support or objections?
>
> None. In fact, thanks to your email, I had to discard my own draft mail
> which said similar things but suggested we branch on Monday. :-)
>
> (Paul, Bert: If you're watching for that mail from me, it won't get sent
> now -- we can discuss and +1 on this thread just as easily.)
>
> +1 to a Friday branch unless folks raise reasonable objections.
Right now, trunk has APIs backing an 'svnadmin info' (or 'svnlook info')
command but not a UI for them. (Some of them have unit tests.) I think we
don't want to release with just the half-backed APIs, so we'll have to either
revert them or add a UI for them. As far as I'm concerned reverting is fine,
and I can continue the work on trunk and propose for backport before, say,
beta1.
This concerns svn_fs_info_* and svn_repos_info_*.
Received on 2013-04-10 18:33:14 CEST