[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Coniguring 301/302 redirects to track an fspath rename

From: Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 14:10:08 -0800 (PST)

FWIW I don't consider YOUR email counterproductive. Let's stop discussing the incivility and move on to more productive discussions, like how svn.apache.org behaves right now towards incubating projects. If compelling evidence presents itself that my module breaks essential features of svn, I'll be the first one to remove it from service.  But really, I can't be the only person on this list interested in interrogating the server before offering an opinion- that makes for lots of useless banter that doesn't move the ball forward IMO. >________________________________ > From: Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com> >To: Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer_at_yahoo.com> >Cc: Branko Čibej <brane_at_wandisco.com>; "dev_at_subversion.apache.org" <dev_at_subversion.apache.org> >Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2013 4:50 PM >Subject: Re: Coniguring 301/302 redirects to track an fspath rename > >On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer_at_yahoo.com> wrote: >> Calling a coded solution a "giant waste >> of time and energy" is highly uncivilized >> at the ASF, please let's not paper over that. > >Oh come on. You're overreacting. > >The fact that you started this discussion (and perhaps your written >code helped drive it a bit) is at least not a waste of time. But you >need to also *allow* discussion, otherwise this is all indeed an >exercise in futility. > >In general though I don't think it's a good idea to spend the effort >of writing some code before you've bounced off your idea with the >community. You might end up wasting your time and energy for something >that maybe isn't such a good idea after all (or something for which >you cannot find consensus in the community, which means you won't get >it in there). > >> The "solution" I have in mind for update and >> checkout support is already live on svn.apache.org, >> all I need is some sensible optional support from >> the client.  Why this involves knuckle-dragging is >> beyond me.  Please do me a favor and test out the >> code I wrote before insulting me further- thx. > >What knuckly-dragging? What "insulting me further"? If you consider my >mail insulting, djeez ... I don't know what to say. Pffff, go ahead >and scare everyone away from a meaningful discussion if you like that. > >-- >Johan > > >
Received on 2013-02-05 23:11:08 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.