[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion merge creates bogus tree conflicts

From: David Moon <david.moon_at_versata.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:44:10 -0500

On Jan 15, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:

> What you'll need to consider is that people will respond to your
> question in at least two ways:
> 1) Discuss and suggest desired behaviour to address your
> particular use
> case, with an eye on improving a future version of Subversion.
> 2) Help you understand the limitations of the current implementation,
> and perhaps suggest ways of dealing with your use case with the
> current implementation.

Thanks for clarifying that.

I personally do not need #2, as I have already switched to a
migrate2svn use case that does not require any use of svn merge. I
probably was not clear enough about that at the end of my initial email.

--Dave Moon
Received on 2013-01-15 15:44:52 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.