Re: Subversion merge creates bogus tree conflicts

On Jan 15, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:

> What you'll need to consider is that people will respond to your
> question in at least two ways:
>
> 1) Discuss and suggest desired behaviour to address your
> particular use
> case, with an eye on improving a future version of Subversion.
>
> 2) Help you understand the limitations of the current implementation,
> and perhaps suggest ways of dealing with your use case with the
> current implementation.

Thanks for clarifying that.

I personally do not need #2, as I have already switched to a
migrate2svn use case that does not require any use of svn merge. I
probably was not clear enough about that at the end of my initial email.

--Dave Moon
Received on 2013-01-15 15:44:52 CET