Re: Subversion merge creates bogus tree conflicts
From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:40:46 +0100
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 09:18:15AM -0500, David Moon wrote:
No, of course it isn't. What Subversion should really be doing here
However, there is the idealised behaviour the community would like to
The current behaviour has been derived from design goals that have long
Part of the process of improving Subversion's behaviour are discussions
What you'll need to consider is that people will respond to your
1) Discuss and suggest desired behaviour to address your particular use
2) Help you understand the limitations of the current implementation,
Please try not to confuse a response that attempts to help you do
I believe Julian is trying to help you to address point 2, to allow
Just making sure you're not talking past each other :)
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.