Re: BDB vs FSFS - OMG!
From: Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan.fuhrmann_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 15:51:16 +0100
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de> wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 11:27:09 +0100:
I used "backend" as a term for FS API implementation.
> > I’m not against dropping support, but if we do it we should do it for
As others already pointed out, I don't think those numbers
The claim here is not that BDB itself was rubbish but that our
> Caching is part of the FSFS backend. One would assume that a key-value
While that is true, there plenty of algorithmic improvements
(1): (2) : (3)
The missing delta and revprop caches hurt the space-optimized
-- Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: * http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download *Received on 2013-01-06 15:51:51 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.