Re: Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files not in a changelist'")

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 16:39:34 +0200

Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 15:37:23 +0100:
> We can also rename it, but that gets a bit ugly because you have to
> consider the case where the changelist you want to rename to also
> exists. I suppose we could try '_none', then '__none', and so on.

Or, in the interest of reversibility, do all of them:

s/^(_*none)$/_\1/
Received on 2013-01-06 15:40:11 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Stefan Fuhrmann: "Re: BDB vs FSFS - OMG!"
Previous message: Stefan Sperling: "Re: Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files *not* in a changelist'")"
In reply to: Stefan Sperling: "Re: Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files *not* in a changelist'")"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

Re: Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files *not* in a changelist'")

Re: Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files not in a changelist'")