Re: [PATCH] fix for diff optimization bug

Hi, Daniel.

Sorry for not understanding using of issue tracker.

> OK, thanks for this. Could you set a more descriptive 'summary' on the
> issue, please? i.e., describe the bug, not just state that there is
> one.

I change to summary to
 'When the identical suffix starts at chunk boundary,
  "svn diff" produces incorrect diff'.

> (Also, Johan is just a volunteer and might not have time to look into
> the bug, despite the fact you've assigned it to him; I suppose you know
> that, but restating it won't hurt.)

I also changed assign to the default owner of libsvn_diff.

On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:39:11 +0200
Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de> wrote:

> Hideki IWAMOTO wrote on Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 21:30:32 +0900:
> > Hi.
> >
> > > Hi Hideki, thanks for the patch. I hope Johan or Julian will have
> > > a look (probably next year), but if you don't get a response please ping
> > > the thread and I'll have a look.
> >
> > I created issue #4283 for diff optimization bug and assigned to Johan.
> >
>
> OK, thanks for this. Could you set a more descriptive 'summary' on the
> issue, please? i.e., describe the bug, not just state that there is
> one.
>
> (Also, Johan is just a volunteer and might not have time to look into
> the bug, despite the fact you've assigned it to him; I suppose you know
> that, but restating it won't hurt.)
>
> Cheers
>
> Daniel
>

-- 
Hideki IWAMOTO <h-iwamoto_at_kit.hi-ho.ne.jp>