Re: SQLite vacuum or auto_vacuum?
From: Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan.fuhrmann_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 13:43:31 +0100
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>wrote:
> Prompted by a question on users I wondered how SQLite's vacuum
So, even after months for (normal) usage,
For a further test I checked-out a ^/subversion/branches working copy
But we keep the pristines in thoses cases
> SQLite has auto_vacuum but it comes with a warning that it may make
Given the modest savings, potential overhead
Perhaps we should add a
Since we use cleanup to reduce the pristine
-- Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: * http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download *Received on 2012-12-03 13:44:06 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.