[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: serf in 1.8

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 03:31:46 +0200

Greg Stein wrote on Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 19:01:25 -0500:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Philip Martin
> <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> >...
> > Another concern is the increased server logging due to the large
> > increase in the number of requests. A 1.8 server does better than older
> > servers, about 50% fewer requests on checkout, but there is still a big
> > increase over neon. No solution other than "it happens".
>
> You keep mentioning this. But what is the problem? "More logs" is too
> subjective to quality as a concern/problem.
>
> In October, svn.apache.org generated about 900M of logs(*). Is that a
> problem? I wouldn't think so. At that rate, a simple 1T drive could
> hold over 83 years of logs. Are there installations busier than

How many years would those 1TB disks last for if all neon clients were
converted to serf?

> svn.a.o? Sure. Can they afford 1T drives? If they're running at that
> rate, then you bet.
>
> Cheers,
> -g
>
> (*) those logs are likely under-sized, as the majority of requests are
> using neon and subkit rather than serf. adjust that 83 *years*
> accordingly.
Received on 2012-11-13 02:32:27 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.