[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: serf in 1.8

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:01:25 -0500

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Philip Martin
<philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>...
> Another concern is the increased server logging due to the large
> increase in the number of requests. A 1.8 server does better than older
> servers, about 50% fewer requests on checkout, but there is still a big
> increase over neon. No solution other than "it happens".

You keep mentioning this. But what is the problem? "More logs" is too
subjective to quality as a concern/problem.

In October, svn.apache.org generated about 900M of logs(*). Is that a
problem? I wouldn't think so. At that rate, a simple 1T drive could
hold over 83 years of logs. Are there installations busier than
svn.a.o? Sure. Can they afford 1T drives? If they're running at that
rate, then you bet.

Cheers,
-g

(*) those logs are likely under-sized, as the majority of requests are
using neon and subkit rather than serf. adjust that 83 *years*
accordingly.
Received on 2012-11-13 01:01:58 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.