[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: maunal WC upgrade test fallout

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 14:09:31 -0400

On 11/02/2012 01:15 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 02.11.2012 15:15, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> What would have been more interesting to know is how they felt about the
>> required one-time manual 'svn upgrade' in 1.7 -- was it troublesome for
>> their processes?
>
> I got exactly one response about the 1.7 upgrade, and it went like this:
> "checked out new working copies because the upgrade didn't work for us."
> Which doesn't really help all that much in retrospect.

No, other than perhaps affirm what Mark Phippard said in earlier iterations
of this discussion topic about how the complaints he heard were generally
not of the "boo, manual upgrade is a pain" variety, but more like, "boo, the
upgrade failed in my scenario".

> Do we want to delay 1.8 until we /can/ do backward-compatible read-only
> operations? I somehow don't think so.

No.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Enterprise Cloud Development

Received on 2012-11-02 19:10:09 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.