[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.8 Progress

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:43:38 +0000

Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org> writes:

> 1) local moves/renames. Based on the conversation I had on IRC this seems
> to be not done yet due to issues found in the original plan. stsp says
> that if it can't be done before we want to otherwise release 1.8 he'd like
> to pull the move code entirely. So the question here is do we wait for
> some unknown amount of time for this to complete? Is this an important 1.8
> feature?

I'd like to get this in. The local-move/incoming-edit stuff is not a
huge task, I think we could get it working before the end of the year.

> 3) libsvn_ra_serf stabilization. I know there have been a couple concerns
> that Philip has raised (EAGAIN and the random failures). Plus there are
> several issues here (not all of the issues here are serf issues):
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/buglist.cgi?issue_status=UNCONFIRMED&issue_status=NEW&issue_status=STARTED&issue_status=REOPENED&subcomponent=libsvn_ra_serf&subcomponent=libsvn_ra_neon
> Who can drive these issues to completion? Is there any additional testing
> work we should do to try and determine the stability of serf in light of
> the fact that we're planning to remove neon?

Reinstate neon? serf has never seemed to be good enough to justify
removing neon: on the client side it is not as reliable, on the server
side the overhead in some cases is still worrying.

Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
Received on 2012-11-02 16:44:15 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.