Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org> writes:
> 1) local moves/renames. Based on the conversation I had on IRC this seems
> to be not done yet due to issues found in the original plan. stsp says
> that if it can't be done before we want to otherwise release 1.8 he'd like
> to pull the move code entirely. So the question here is do we wait for
> some unknown amount of time for this to complete? Is this an important 1.8
I'd like to get this in. The local-move/incoming-edit stuff is not a
huge task, I think we could get it working before the end of the year.
> 3) libsvn_ra_serf stabilization. I know there have been a couple concerns
> that Philip has raised (EAGAIN and the random failures). Plus there are
> several issues here (not all of the issues here are serf issues):
> Who can drive these issues to completion? Is there any additional testing
> work we should do to try and determine the stability of serf in light of
> the fact that we're planning to remove neon?
Reinstate neon? serf has never seemed to be good enough to justify
removing neon: on the client side it is not as reliable, on the server
side the overhead in some cases is still worrying.
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
Received on 2012-11-02 16:44:15 CET