Re: Patch to remove libsvn_ra_neon

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Hyrum K Wright
<hyrum.wright_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> We've had the "should we remove neon?" discussion before, and the
> consensus has felt to resolve in the affirmative.  Now is the time for
> action.
>
> I've got a 586 kb patch which removes libsvn_ra_neon from trunk.  It
> doesn't not remove the --http-library runtime option or config file
> code, but does remove the various build stuff which supports building
> neon.  I obviously haven't tested this on all platforms, and I
> wouldn't be surprised if it causes some short-term breakage.  My plan
> is to commit this patch Real Soon Now, pending any very vocal
> objections from folks on this list.

Maybe do it as a number of reviewable pieces, rather than one mother patch?

Cheers,
-g
Received on 2012-06-13 09:34:23 CEST