Re: [DISCUSS] delete ra_neon
Justin Erenkrantz wrote on Sat, May 19, 2012 at 08:05:34 -0700:
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> > Well, we could have a single ra_dav library with a backend_supports_synchronity
> > bitfield.
> > In theory, at least.
> The code would be so completely different there'd be very little code
> reuse - you're best just having it into two separately
> libraries...IMO. -- justin
Yes, I imagined that might be the case.
Received on 2012-05-19 22:58:04 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev