[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [DISCUSS] delete ra_neon

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 23:57:27 +0300

Justin Erenkrantz wrote on Sat, May 19, 2012 at 08:05:34 -0700:
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> > Well, we could have a single ra_dav library with a backend_supports_synchronity
> > bitfield.
> >
> > In theory, at least.
>
> The code would be so completely different there'd be very little code
> reuse - you're best just having it into two separately
> libraries...IMO. -- justin

Yes, I imagined that might be the case.
Received on 2012-05-19 22:58:04 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.