[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [DISCUSS] delete ra_neon

From: Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 19:06:05 +0400

On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
<justin_at_erenkrantz.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>>> Ewww.  You are evil.  Go away, and come back when you are less evil.
>>>
>>> Just kidding.  But seriously ... evil.
>>
>> So why won't Ivan's idea work?
>>
>> (I assume it won't work, but now that it's been aired it would be nice
>> to hear from an ra_serf person _why_ it won't work.)
>
> Short answer: neon is a synchronous library while serf is an
> asynchronous library.  The internal paradigms for ra_serf and ra_neon
> are completely different due to that.
In reality ra_serf uses synchronous request for everything except
update editor. And it's can be easily avoided by implementing
non-skelta mode in ra_serf (ra_http).

-- 
Ivan Zhakov
Received on 2012-05-19 17:06:57 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.