Re: [DISCUSS] delete ra_neon
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>>> Ewww. You are evil. Go away, and come back when you are less evil.
>>> Just kidding. But seriously ... evil.
>> So why won't Ivan's idea work?
>> (I assume it won't work, but now that it's been aired it would be nice
>> to hear from an ra_serf person _why_ it won't work.)
> Short answer: neon is a synchronous library while serf is an
> asynchronous library. The internal paradigms for ra_serf and ra_neon
> are completely different due to that.
In reality ra_serf uses synchronous request for everything except
update editor. And it's can be easily avoided by implementing
non-skelta mode in ra_serf (ra_http).
Received on 2012-05-19 17:06:57 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev