Julian Foad wrote on Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 21:11:55 +0100:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Would having an explicit
> > Skipped duplicated target 'foo'
> > notification address your concern?
> It would mitigate the negative consequences. At least the user would then know they'd made a mistake. Still lacking any positive justification, so -0.25 :-)
The positive justification was that if we interpret 'svn add foo bar' as
'add foo and bar', we might want to define the semantics as a set --- in
which case erroring out on 'svn add foo foo' is wrong.
Anyway, I won't pursue it.
> - Julian
> > Julian Foad wrote on Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 15:47:34 +0100:
> >> In the issue, you give the example "$svn add f* *o", and then
> >> claim svn should eliminate duplicate args for you. But why
> >> should it?
> >> In short, -0.5.
Received on 2012-03-29 22:52:01 CEST