[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1304614 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:47:17 +0100

Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> writes:

> Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> writes:
>> What's going on?
> The change fixes the test by causing the -r9:1 merge to be done in the
> "right" way as -r8:6 then -r6:1

With r1304613 I get valgrind warnings on the failing merge:

==6510== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==6510== at 0x4E76DBC: compare_merge_source_ts (merge.c:6206)
==6510== by 0x651B809: msort_with_tmp (msort.c:84)
==6510== by 0x651BBDB: qsort_r (msort.c:298)
==6510== by 0x4E77134: combine_range_with_segments (merge.c:6306)
==6510== by 0x4E775C7: normalize_merge_sources_internal (merge.c:6469)
==6510== by 0x4E77928: normalize_merge_sources (merge.c:6562)
==6510== by 0x4E81361: merge_peg_locked (merge.c:10814)
==6510== by 0x4E8162D: svn_client_merge_peg4 (merge.c:10867)
==6510== by 0x418335: svn_cl__merge (merge-cmd.c:447)
==6510== by 0x416F91: main (main.c:2699)

These go away with r1304614 but that might be false negative. If there
is still a sorting problem it would explain why some buildbots PASS and
some FAIL.

uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
Received on 2012-03-27 15:47:54 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.